<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for New York Process Server Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog</link>
	<description>New York Legal Service Directory for NY Process Servers, NY Lawyers, NY notaries and NY Paralegals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New York City to Process Servers:&#8221;Drop Dead&#8221; by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2011/11/11/new-york-city-to-process-serversdrop-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-17262</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=86#comment-17262</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. Somehow DCA caught all of us process servers off guard and now we are helplessly waiting for February 29, 2012 when it is time to renew our licenses under their new rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. Somehow DCA caught all of us process servers off guard and now we are helplessly waiting for February 29, 2012 when it is time to renew our licenses under their new rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New York City to Process Servers:&#8221;Drop Dead&#8221; by Chris Rossi</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2011/11/11/new-york-city-to-process-serversdrop-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-15472</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=86#comment-15472</guid>
		<description>I agree that the idiots at the DCA have no clue that they are ruining the process serving business in NYC with these regulations. The DCA will collect 10.5 million dollars in bs fines from all small businesses in NYC this fiscal year. That&#039;s a 45% increase from 2009. So have businesses in NYC become wildly unscrupulous over the last 2 years? No. The DCA has one goal- make money for the City bureaucrats to justify their department and their jobs. The fact that this is happening at all is a disgrace. The fact that it&#039;s happening in the worst economic times our city has experienced since the recession is a bigger disgrace. This must be exposed. OccupyDCA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the idiots at the DCA have no clue that they are ruining the process serving business in NYC with these regulations. The DCA will collect 10.5 million dollars in bs fines from all small businesses in NYC this fiscal year. That&#8217;s a 45% increase from 2009. So have businesses in NYC become wildly unscrupulous over the last 2 years? No. The DCA has one goal- make money for the City bureaucrats to justify their department and their jobs. The fact that this is happening at all is a disgrace. The fact that it&#8217;s happening in the worst economic times our city has experienced since the recession is a bigger disgrace. This must be exposed. OccupyDCA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Worked Up and Serving Sara: Process Servers At Wrong Places by Mike</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2010/06/11/worked-up-and-serving-sara-process-servers-at-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=56#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>I hate Byron. His presence and his voice are annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Byron. His presence and his voice are annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the New York Process Server Organization Directory by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2009/05/03/welcome-to-the-new-york-process-server-organization-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-13700</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=5#comment-13700</guid>
		<description>You are right about that. McEldery is just an actor, pretending to be an incompetent, preposterous process server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right about that. McEldery is just an actor, pretending to be an incompetent, preposterous process server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Worked Up and Serving Sara: Process Servers At Wrong Places by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2010/06/11/worked-up-and-serving-sara-process-servers-at-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-13699</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=56#comment-13699</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Byron lends poor credibility to the business of process serving. I wish that the stereotype that he is promoting was rejected by the public in general, because he is not representative of process servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Byron lends poor credibility to the business of process serving. I wish that the stereotype that he is promoting was rejected by the public in general, because he is not representative of process servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Serving Family Court Petitions in New York by BG mail</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2009/05/26/serving-family-court-petitions-in-new-york/comment-page-2/#comment-12263</link>
		<dc:creator>BG mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=16#comment-12263</guid>
		<description>There are actually a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a nice point to convey up. I provide the thoughts above as basic inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you bring up the place the most important thing will be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged around issues like that, however I&#039;m certain that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each girls and boys really feel the impact of only a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are actually a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a nice point to convey up. I provide the thoughts above as basic inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you bring up the place the most important thing will be working in trustworthy good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged around issues like that, however I&#8217;m certain that your job is clearly identified as a good game. Each girls and boys really feel the impact of only a second’s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Worked Up and Serving Sara: Process Servers At Wrong Places by Matt</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2010/06/11/worked-up-and-serving-sara-process-servers-at-wrong-places/comment-page-1/#comment-11128</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=56#comment-11128</guid>
		<description>Thank you Byron is very unprofessional I have 
never passed judgment and understand that they 
are selling the show but they tell me that these
papers need served to this guy by this time it isn&#039;t my business to know whats going on just if they are violent and just give the papers and go never sit and chat or tell them how they are a bad person I cant watch it I change the channel in fact the only one I can watch is lizard lick 
its so fake...same with southern fried ???....its
all rehearsed with actors that failed high school drama...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Byron is very unprofessional I have<br />
never passed judgment and understand that they<br />
are selling the show but they tell me that these<br />
papers need served to this guy by this time it isn&#8217;t my business to know whats going on just if they are violent and just give the papers and go never sit and chat or tell them how they are a bad person I cant watch it I change the channel in fact the only one I can watch is lizard lick<br />
its so fake&#8230;same with southern fried ???&#8230;.its<br />
all rehearsed with actors that failed high school drama&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Effect Process Service on Evasive Defendants (Or Difficult Defendants). by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2009/11/18/process-service-on-evasive-or-difficult-defendants/comment-page-1/#comment-10347</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=28#comment-10347</guid>
		<description>Serving process on Sundays, Saturdays and holidays is also acceptable provided that the court allows it. Certain particular cases can be served on Sundays without getting a judge&#039;s express approval. For instance, NY allows service of restraining orders (Orders of protection) on Sunday. Therefore a stakeout on Sunday for the purpose of serving an order of protection is perfectly acceptable under current  CPLR.
The Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serving process on Sundays, Saturdays and holidays is also acceptable provided that the court allows it. Certain particular cases can be served on Sundays without getting a judge&#8217;s express approval. For instance, NY allows service of restraining orders (Orders of protection) on Sunday. Therefore a stakeout on Sunday for the purpose of serving an order of protection is perfectly acceptable under current  CPLR.<br />
The Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Effect Process Service on Evasive Defendants (Or Difficult Defendants). by Chris</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2009/11/18/process-service-on-evasive-or-difficult-defendants/comment-page-1/#comment-10332</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=28#comment-10332</guid>
		<description>Pretty sure the CPLR prohibits service on a Sunday.  So your church stakeout idea wasn&#039;t valid service.  You also can&#039;t serve a defendant on a Saturday, if Saturday is their holy day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure the CPLR prohibits service on a Sunday.  So your church stakeout idea wasn&#8217;t valid service.  You also can&#8217;t serve a defendant on a Saturday, if Saturday is their holy day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to the New York Process Server Organization Directory by Jammer</title>
		<link>http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/2009/05/03/welcome-to-the-new-york-process-server-organization-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newyorkprocessserver.org/blog/?p=5#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>Byron McEldry takes things way too far and airs people&#039;s private dirty laundry that I just don&#039;t think should be legal to do so! If you would just ask if they are so-&amp;-so, and when they say yes, just hand them the papers and then say &quot;you&#039;ve been served!&quot;  You don&#039;t need to tell them that they are a deadbeat dad or whatever you think about them.  You&#039;re going to end up getting really hurt one of these days by getting into people&#039;s personal business.   I know I&#039;d be extremely upset if you were to comeat me like that!! You always say, &quot;I don&#039;t understand why he/she got so aggressive - I didn&#039;t want that to go that far.&quot;  But YOU made it go there.  Your life and job would be a lot less stressful and scary if you&#039;d just serve them the papers.  Stay out of their business!  There&#039;s 2 (or 3 sides to every story ... you just take the word of the plaintiff - I think that&#039;s just being ignorant!
Shame on Tru-TV for airing this show ... don&#039;t we have enough drama in life?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byron McEldry takes things way too far and airs people&#8217;s private dirty laundry that I just don&#8217;t think should be legal to do so! If you would just ask if they are so-&amp;-so, and when they say yes, just hand them the papers and then say &#8220;you&#8217;ve been served!&#8221;  You don&#8217;t need to tell them that they are a deadbeat dad or whatever you think about them.  You&#8217;re going to end up getting really hurt one of these days by getting into people&#8217;s personal business.   I know I&#8217;d be extremely upset if you were to comeat me like that!! You always say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t understand why he/she got so aggressive &#8211; I didn&#8217;t want that to go that far.&#8221;  But YOU made it go there.  Your life and job would be a lot less stressful and scary if you&#8217;d just serve them the papers.  Stay out of their business!  There&#8217;s 2 (or 3 sides to every story &#8230; you just take the word of the plaintiff &#8211; I think that&#8217;s just being ignorant!<br />
Shame on Tru-TV for airing this show &#8230; don&#8217;t we have enough drama in life?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.421 seconds -->

